THE EFFECTIVENESS OF USING SELF-CHECK IN ESSAY WRITING: STUDENTS PERCEPTIONS

Khairul Azmi, Zulhiddah Zulhiddah

Abstract


This study investigates students' perceptions of the effectiveness of self-check as a writing strategy in academic essay courses at the University in North Sumatra. Using a qualitative descriptive design, data was collected from 33 undergraduate students through class observation, analysis of essay draft documents, and structured questionnaires. The findings showed that the majority of students (81.8%) found self-check beneficial for improving structural organization, grammatical accuracy, and writing clarity. Nevertheless, neutral responses were prevalent regarding understanding checklist criteria (66.7%), and some students (24.2%) continued to have difficulty revising their essays after the self-examination process, underscoring the need for explicit instructor scaffolding and modeling. Perceptions of time efficiency vary widely, suggesting that self-check can initially impose cognitive demands on novice learners. Overall, the results show that self-examination not only improves technical writing competence but also fosters learners' metacognitive awareness and autonomy. These findings highlight the important role of structured tutoring, peer demonstration, and step-by-step instructional practice in maximizing the pedagogical benefits of self-check in writing teaching.


Keywords


Self-Check, Essay Writing, Students Perceptions

Full Text:

PDF

References


Bhuana, G. P., & Fauziah, U. N. E. (2021). Affective damage from teachers’ written corrective feedback. EduLite: Journal of English Education, Literature and Culture, 6(2), 287–299. https://doi.org/10.30659/E.6.2.287-299.

Burner, K. J. (2007). The effects of reflective and reflexive writing prompts on students' self regulation and academic performance. The Florida State University.

Călinescu, A. (2024). The mechanics of ESL/EFL writing performance at the tertiary level. EFL Writing Performance at the Tertiary Level

Cer, E. (2019). The Instruction of Writing Strategies: The Effect of the Metacognitive Strategy on the Writing Skills of Pupils in Secondary Education, SAGE Journals 9(2), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244019842681

Creswell, J. W. (1994). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches.

Dewi, U. (2023). Grammarly as Automated Writing Evaluation: Its Effectiveness from EFL Students Perceptions. Lingua Cultura, 16(2), 155–161. https://doi.org/10.21512/lc.v16i2.8315

Evmenova, A., Regan, K., Mergen, R., & Hrisseh, R. (2024). Improving writing feedback for struggling writers: Generative AI to the rescue? TechTrends, 68(4), 790–802. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-024-00965-y.

Hyland, K. (2019). Second language writing. Cambridge university press.

Kitjaroonchai, N., Kitjaroonchai, T., & Sanitchai, P. (2022). The Effects of Process Genre-Based Writing and Process Writing Approaches on Asian EFL Pre-University Students’ Writing Performance. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 13(4), 775–785. https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.1304.19

Lee, I. (2008). Understanding teachers’ written feedback practices in Hong Kong secondary classrooms. Journal of Second https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2007.10.001.

Othman, S., Rahmat, H. N., Aripin, N., & Janudin, S. (2021). Writers’ Beliefs in Academic Writing, 12(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v12-i1/11312

Saldaña, J. (2014). Coding and Analysis Strategies. In The Oxford Handbook of Qualitative Research (Number April). https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199811755.013.001

Sweller, J. (1988). Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning. Cognitive Science, 12(2), 257–285. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog1202_4.

Toba, R., Noor, W., & Sanu, L. (2019). The Current Issues of Indonesian EFL Students’ Writing Skills: Ability, Problem, and Reason in Writing Comparison and Contrast Essay. Dinamika Ilmu, 19(1), 57-73. https://doi.org/10.21093/di.v19i1.1506

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.

Vögelin, C., Jansen, T., Keller, S. D., Machts, N., Möller, J. (2019). The influence of lexical features on teacher judgements of ESL argumentative essays, 39, 64–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2018.12.003

Zimmerman, BJ (2002). Becoming a Self-Regulated Learner: An Overview, 41(2), 64–70. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4102_2




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30829/vis.v22i1.5472

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2026 VISION

Indexing and Abstracting: