TEACHER’S PERCEPTIONS OF USING PICTURE-BASED MEDIA TO SUPPORT READING SKILLS FOR STUDENTS IN AN INCLUSIVE CLASSROOM

Dinda Sundana

Abstract


Reading instruction in inclusive classrooms is challenged by wide differences in students’ reading ability and learning needs. Picture-based media such as picture cards and contextual images can offer visual support for vocabulary and meaning, yet most previous studies have examined student learning outcomes in regular classrooms rather than teachers’ perceptions in inclusive settings. This study aimed to describe how an English teacher perceives the use of picture-based media to support students’ reading skills in an inclusive classroom and to identify the challenges encountered in implementing it. A descriptive qualitative design with a phenomenological approach was applied at MTs Taman Pendidikan Islam, an inclusive Islamic junior high school. Data were gathered through a semi-structured interview with the English teacher, non-participant classroom observation, and documentation, and were analysed using the interactive model of Miles, Huberman, and Saldaña (data condensation, data display, and conclusion drawing). The findings show that the teacher holds a positive perception of picture-based media, viewing it as a learning scaffold, a driver of motivation and participation, a support for comprehension and vocabulary through a predict–read–verify sequence, and a medium that can be adapted to diverse learners. The teacher also reported four challenges: differences in reading ability, limited preparation time, inadequate technical facilities, and difficulty in selecting pictures suitable for all students. These were addressed through adaptive strategies and collaboration with a special assistance teacher. The study suggests that effective use of picture-based media depends on both teachers’ adaptability and institutional support.

Keywords: picture-based media, teacher’s perceptions, reading skills, inclusive classroom, slow learners


Full Text:

PDF

References


Al-Barakat, A., & Alali, S. (2024). Linguistic picture-based activities for improving reading comprehension among children. XLinguae, 17(4), 134–149.

Almalky, H. A., & Alwahbi, A. (2023). Teachers’ attitudes and self-efficacy toward inclusive education for students with intellectual disabilities. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 136, 104584.

Anderson, R. C., Hiebert, E. H., Scott, J. A., & Wilkinson, I. A. G. (1985). Becoming a nation of readers: The report of the Commission on Reading. National Academy of Education.

Ardhian, S. M., Safri, T. M., Nurrahmi, N., & Yuliana, C. P. (2025). Implementasi program Gerakan Literasi Sekolah menggunakan teknik membaca ideovisual di Sekolah Luar Biasa YPAC Banda Aceh. Baitul ’Ulum: Jurnal Ilmu Perpustakaan dan Informasi, 8(2), 84–95. https://doi.org/10.30631/baitululum.v8i2.239

Arikunto, S. (2012). Prosedur penelitian: Suatu pendekatan praktik (Rev. ed.). Rineka Cipta.

Bachtiar, B., Juhana, J., & Pratiwi, R. (2024). Visual literacy training and its impact on EFL teachers’ instructional materials in Indonesia. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 23(3), 102–118.

Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27–40.

CAST. (2018). Universal design for learning guidelines version 2.2. CAST.

Clandinin, D. J., & Connelly, F. M. (2000). Narrative inquiry: Experience and story in qualitative research. Jossey-Bass.

Clark, J. M., & Paivio, A. (1991). Dual coding theory and education. Educational Psychology Review, 3(3), 149–210.

Cobb, M. M. (1961). Characteristics of slow learners. The Clearing House, 35(6), 345–348.

Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Creswell, J. W., & Miller, D. L. (2000). Determining validity in qualitative inquiry. Theory Into Practice, 39(3), 124–130.

Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Farrar, R., Arizpe, E., & Lees, A. (2024). Teachers’ use of picturebooks in primary literacy: Perspectives from research. International Journal of Primary, Elementary and Early Years Education, 52(1), 1–15.

Hadi, S. (2013). Metodologi penelitian. Andi Offset.

Hermawan, S. K. D. A., & Suparmi. (2025). Characteristics and needs of slow learners in the learning process. Multidisciplinary Indonesian Center Journal (MICJO), 2(3), 3325–3332.

Jannah, M., & Artiningsih, A. (2025). Improving early reading skills through picture word cards at RA Ma’arif III Tanjungarum. Jurnal Profesi Guru Indonesia, 2(1), 203–213.

Jury, M., Laurence, A., Cèbe, S., & Desombre, C. (2023). Teachers’ practices in inclusive education: Predicting factors and relationship with student outcomes. Frontiers in Education, 7, 1065919.

Kusmaryono, I. (2023). Implementasi pendidikan inklusif: Tantangan dan solusi. Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar, 10(1), 12–23.

Kuo, Y.-C. (2020). Using visual media to support language and literacy: A case study of storytelling with picture books. International Journal of Instruction, 13(1), 365–380.

Kvale, S., & Brinkmann, S. (2009). Interviews: Learning the craft of qualitative research interviewing (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications.

Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. SAGE Publications.

Mahastuti, D. (2011). Mengenal lebih dekat anak lambat belajar. Personifikasi: Jurnal Ilmu Psikologi, 2(1).

Mayer, R. E. (2009). Multimedia learning (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.

Merriam, S. B., & Tisdell, E. J. (2016). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation (4th ed.). Jossey-Bass.

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.

Moustakas, C. (1994). Phenomenological research methods. SAGE Publications.

Nabiela, N., & Ulfatin, N. (2023). Implementation of inclusive education in Indonesia: Challenges and strategies. International Journal of Educational Research and Social Sciences, 4(2), 215–224.

Nurhayati, N., Hidayah, R., & Permana, A. (2024). The effectiveness of picture storybooks in improving reading comprehension and student engagement. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran, 31(1), 45–57.

Paivio, A. (1986). Mental representations: A dual coding approach. Oxford University Press.

Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.

Pratiwi, S., & Sukartono, S. (2025). Persepsi guru terhadap implementasi pendidikan inklusif di sekolah dasar. Jurnal Hardiknas, 2(1), 1–12.

Prihantini, & Fauziyyah, H. M. (2023). Survey of reading interest of elementary school students towards picture story books: Recommend the role of school libraries in providing book collections. Journal of Education Research, 4(4), 2267–2280. https://doi.org/10.37985/jer.v4i4.612

Rahmatullah Achmad, A. (2024). Pembelajaran dengan media flashcard untuk meningkatkan kemampuan membaca pada anak slow learner di kelas inklusi Sekolah Dasar Negeri Ambulu 01 [Undergraduate thesis, UIN Kiai Haji Achmad Siddiq Jember].

Sánchez-Cantero, G., & López-Morales, H. (2025). Developing EFL students’ multimodal literacy with the use of infographics. Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education, 10, 1–22.

Silvia, D., & Ishartiwi, I. (2025). Contextual visual media for students with learning difficulties including dyslexia: Cognitive load and information processing. Jurnal Pendidikan Khusus, 22(1), 33–47.

Sonia, S., Mahdum, M., & Purwanti, S. (2024). Teachers’ perceptions, attitudes, and competency on Internet, Communication, and Technology integration in the EFL classroom in Indonesia. European Journal of English Language Studies, 4(2), 53–66.

Sulistiyowati, S., Rahayu, T., & Kurniawan, D. (2025). The impact of picture cards on improving reading abilities of elementary school students: Word recognition and reading fluency. Jurnal Ilmiah Sekolah Dasar, 9(1), 78–89.

Tindal, G., & Nisbet, D. (2010). The relevance of reading components in ELL settings. Educational Assessment, 15(3–4), 155–173.

Tomlinson, C. A. (2001). How to differentiate instruction in mixed-ability classrooms (2nd ed.). Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

Una, L. M. W., Beku, V. Y., Soro, V. M., & Laksana, D. N. L. (2023). Pendekatan layanan pendidikan bagi anak berkebutuhan khusus. Jurnal Pendidikan Inklusi Citra Bakti, 1(2), 148–158.

UNESCO. (1994). The Salamanca statement and framework for action on special needs education. UNESCO.

UNESCO. (2024). Inclusive education: 30 years since Salamanca. UNESCO Publishing.

Yada, A., Björn, P. M., Savolainen, P., Kyttälä, M., Aro, M., & Savolainen, H. (2022). Pre-service teachers’ self-efficacy in implementing inclusive practices and resilience in Finland. Teaching and Teacher Education, 110, 103568.

Yunus, M. M., Salehi, H., & John, D. S. A. (2013). Using visual aids as a motivational tool in enhancing students’ interest in reading literary texts. Recent Advances in Educational Technologies, 32–38.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

INDEXING

 

 

Creative Commons License


Bright Vision by UIN Sumatera Utara Medan is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Based on a work at http://jurnaltarbiyah.uinsu.ac.id/index.php/brightvision.