Editorial Policies

Focus and Scope

Tazkiya: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam

Focuses on providing opportunities for researchers in the field of education, especially the results of research and research that are relevant to Islamic Education to be published.

Fokus memberikan kesempatan kepada peneliti di bidang pendidikan khususnya hasil penelitian dan penelitian yang relevan dengan Pendidikan Islam untuk dipublikasikan.

As for the scope of Islamic Education that is meant is:

  1. Islamic Education (Pendidikan Agama Islam)
  2. Islamic Education Management (Manajemen Pendidikan Islam)
  3. History of Islamic Education (Sejarah Pendidikan Islam)
  4. Islamic Education Curriculum (Kurikulum Pendidikan Islam)
  5. Islamic Education Institutions (Lembaga Pendidikan Islam)
  6. Islamic Educational Psychology (Psikologi Pendidikan Islam)
  7. Character Education in Islamic (Pendidikan Karakter dalam Islam)
  8. Learning Process (Proses pembelajaran)
  9. Etc.

 

Section Policies

Articles

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed
 

Publication Frequency

This journal is published in 2 editions every year at January-June and July-December.

Jurnal ini terbit dalam 2 edisi setiap tahun pada bulan Januari-Juni dan Juli-Desember.

 

Open Access Policy

This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.

Jurnal ini menyediakan akses terbuka langsung ke isinya dengan prinsip bahwa membuat penelitian tersedia secara bebas untuk umum mendukung pertukaran pengetahuan global yang lebih besar.

 

Publication Ethics

In English

The statement of publications ethic is a code of ethics for all participants involved in the publication process of this journal; editor in chief, editors, reviewers, and writers. The Code of Ethics for Scientific Publications essentially consists of three publication ethic, (i) Neutrality, which is free from conflict in managing of  publications; (ii) Justice, authorship rights is given to the authors; and (iii) Honesty, i.e. free from duplication, fabrication, falsification, and plagiarism in publications.

Duty and Responsibility of Journal Manager

  1. Determine the name of the journal, scope of Science, scale, and accreditation if necessary.
  2. Managing of editorial membership.
  3. Define the relationship between the publisher, editor, reviewer, and others in a contract.
  4. Respect to confidential thing among researchers who contribute, authors/writers, editors, and reviewers.
  5. Applying of norms and provisions regarding to intellectual property rights, especially copyright.
  6. Review journal policies and submit them to the author/writer, editorial, reviewers, and readers.
  7. Create guidelines for editors and reviewers.
  8. Publish journals regularly.
  9. Guarantee the availability of financial for the sustainability of publishing.
  10. Build a cooperation and marketing.
  11. Preparing of licensing and legality.

Duty and Responsibility of Editor

  1. As a bridge between the needs of readers and authors/writers.
  2. Attempt to increase the quality of publication.
  3. Implementing of the processes to guarantee the quality of writing.
  4. Promote the freedom in expressing of the opinion objectively.
  5. Seeing the author's academic track record.
  6. Submit corrections, clarifications, cancellation, and apologies if it is needed.
  7. Responsible for the style and format of the paper, while the contents and all statements in the paper are the author/writer’s responsibility.
  8. Sharing and asking of the opinions to the authors, readers, reviewers, and editorial to improve the quality of publications.
  9. Encourage the evaluation of the journal if there is an innovation.
  10. Initiatives to guide researchers about the publication ethic.
  11. Assess the effect of published policies towards the attitude of author/writers, and reviewers to improve the responsibility and minimize errors.
  12. Open mind to new opinions or other perception.
  13. Not maintaining one's opinion, the author or other that can lead to subjective decision.
  14. Support the author/writer improve their work.

The Duty and Responsibility of Reviewer

  1. Run the duty from the editor to review the paper and submit to the editor to determine the eligibility of a paper.
  2. The reviewers are not permitted to examine papers which involve their selves either directly or indirectly.
  3. Save author’s privacy, keep the results of correction, suggestion, and recommendations by giving criticism, suggestions, and recommendations.
  4. Support the author/writer improve their paper.
  5. Re-examine the manuscript that has been repaired based on the standardization.
  6. The manuscript must be reviewed based on the style of the submission guidelines (data collection methods, author's legality, conclusions, etc.).

Duty and Responsibility of Writer/Author

  1. Ensuring that those include to the list of authors/writers meet the criteria as an author/writer.
  2. Responsible for the duty collectively and the content of the article including to the method, analysis, calculation in detail.
  3. Define the origin of the resources (including funding) directly and indirectly.
  4. Explain limitations of the research.
  5. Respond to comments made by reviewers professionally and timely manner.
  6. Inform the editor if retract the writing.
  7. Make a statement of originality, it has never been published anywhere in any language, and it is not being submitted to other publishing.

Bahasa Indonesia

Pernyataan etika publikasi merupakan kode etik bagi semua pihak yang terlibat dalam proses publikasi jurnal; ketua editor, editor, reviewer, dan penulis. Kode Etik Publikasi Ilmiah pada dasarnya terdiri dari tiga etika publikasi, (i) Netralitas, yaitu bebas dari konflik dalam pengelolaan publikasi; (ii) Keadilan, yaitu hak kepengarangan diberikan kepada penulis; dan (iii) Kejujuran, yaitu bebas dari duplikasi, fabrikasi, pemalsuan, dan plagiarisme dalam publikasi.

Tugas dan Tanggung Jawab Kepala Editor Jurnal

  1. Tentukan nama jurnal, ruang lingkup ilmu, skala, dan akreditasi jika diperlukan.
  2. Mengelola keanggotaan redaksi.
  3. Menentukan hubungan antara penerbit, editor, reviewer, dan lainnya dalam sebuah kontrak.
  4. Menghormati hal yang bersifat rahasia antara peneliti yang berkontribusi, penulis/penulis, editor, dan reviewer.
  5. Penerapan norma dan ketentuan mengenai hak atas kekayaan intelektual, khususnya hak cipta.
  6. Tinjau kebijakan jurnal dan serahkan kepada penulis/penulis, editorial, reviewer, dan pembaca.
  7. Buat pedoman untuk editor dan pengulas.
  8. Publikasikan jurnal secara berkala.
  9. Menjamin ketersediaan finansial untuk keberlangsungan penerbitan.
  10. Membangun kerjasama dan pemasaran.
  11. Persiapan perizinan dan legalitas.

Tugas dan Tanggung Jawab Editor

  1. Sebagai jembatan antara kebutuhan pembaca dan penulis/penulis.
  2. Upaya meningkatkan kualitas publikasi.
  3. Menerapkan proses untuk menjamin kualitas tulisan
  4. Mempromosikan kebebasan dalam menyatakan pendapat secara objektif.
  5. Melihat rekam jejak akademik penulis.
  6. Menyerahkan koreksi, klarifikasi, pembatalan, dan permintaan maaf jika diperlukan.
  7. Bertanggung jawab atas gaya dan format makalah, sedangkan isi dan semua pernyataan dalam makalah menjadi tanggung jawab penulis/penulis.
  8. Berbagi dan meminta pendapat kepada penulis, pembaca, reviewer, dan redaksi untuk meningkatkan kualitas publikasi.
  9. Mendorong evaluasi jurnal jika ada inovasi.
  10. Inisiatif untuk memandu peneliti tentang etika publikasi.
  11. Menilai pengaruh kebijakan yang diterbitkan terhadap sikap penulis/penulis, dan pengulas untuk meningkatkan tanggung jawab dan meminimalkan kesalahan.
  12. Buka pikiran untuk pendapat baru atau persepsi lain.
  13. Tidak mempertahankan pendapat, penulis atau orang lain yang dapat menyebabkan keputusan subjektif.
  14. Dukung penulis/penulis untuk meningkatkan karyanya.

Tugas dan Tanggung Jawab Reviewer

  1. Jalankan tugas dari editor untuk meninjau makalah dan serahkan ke editor untuk menentukan kelayakan sebuah makalah.
  2. Reviewer tidak diperkenankan untuk meneliti makalah yang melibatkan dirinya baik secara langsung maupun tidak langsung.
  3. Selamatkan privasi penulis, simpan hasil koreksi, saran, dan rekomendasi dengan memberikan kritik, saran, dan rekomendasi.
  4. Mendukung penulis/penulis memperbaiki makalahnya.
  5. Periksa kembali naskah/manuskrip yang telah diperbaiki berdasarkan standarisasi
  6. Naskah harus ditinjau berdasarkan gaya pedoman pengajuan (metode pengumpulan data, legalitas penulis, kesimpulan, dll.).

Tugas dan Tanggung Jawab Penulis

  1. Memastikan bahwa mereka yang termasuk dalam daftar penulis/penulis memenuhi kriteria sebagai penulis/penulis.
  2. Bertanggung jawab atas tugas secara kolektif dan isi artikel termasuk metode, analisis, perhitungan secara rinci.
  3. Menentukan asal sumber daya (termasuk pendanaan) secara langsung dan tidak langsung.
  4. Menjelaskan keterbatasan penelitian.
  5. Menanggapi komentar yang dibuat oleh pengulas secara profesional dan tepat waktu.
  6. Memberi tahu editor jika menarik kembali tulisan tersebut.
  7. Membuat pernyataan orisinalitas, belum pernah dipublikasikan di mana pun dalam bahasa apapun, dan tidak sedang diajukan ke penerbitan lain.

 

Publication Fee

Jurnal ini mengenakan biaya penulis sebagai berikut (Dimulai dari Edisi Juni 2026)

- Pengiriman Artikel: 0,00 (IDR)
- Penulis diharuskan membayar Biaya Pemrosesan Artikel sebagai bagian dari proses pengiriman untuk berkontribusi pada biaya peninjauan.

- Biaya Pemrosesan Artikel: 150.000 (IDR)

Jika makalah ini diterima untuk dipublikasikan, Anda akan diminta untuk membayar Biaya Pemrosesan Artikel untuk menutupi biaya publikasi.

 

Peer Review Process

Peer Review Process

1. Submission
Author(s) are required to submit manuscripts that align with the journal’s aims and scope and are prepared in accordance with the journal's Author Guidelines. All submissions must be made through the system.

2. Initial Editorial Review
The Editor-in-Chief, together with at least two members of the Editorial Board, conducts an initial screening of each submitted manuscript. To proceed beyond this stage, the manuscript must align with the journal’s aims and scope, follow the required format, and demonstrate a Plagiarism Policy of no more than 25%. Manuscripts are also screened for ethical compliance and adherence to academic integrity standards. (Estimated processing time: 7 days).

3. Peer Review
The selected peer reviewers evaluate the manuscript and provide one of the following recommendations:
- Accept without revision
- Accept with minor revisions
- Accept with major revisions
- Reject
Authors are notified of the reviewers’ decisions through the system, including any required revisions prior to publication. The journal employs a double-blind peer review process to ensure fairness, transparency, and academic integrity. (Estimated processing time: 21–30 days).

4. Revision
Authors revise their manuscripts in accordance with the reviewers’ form recommendations. (Estimated processing time: 14–21 days).

5. Final Editorial Review
Manuscripts requiring major revisions are returned to the same peer reviewers for a second round of peer review. (Additional estimated processing time: 14–21 days).
The Editorial Board then evaluates the revised manuscript together with the authors’ responses to the reviewers’ comments. (Estimated processing time: 14–21 days for each manuscript, depending on submission order).

6. Editorial Decision
Following the Editor-in-Chief’s final decision, the author(s) receive an official notification of acceptance, revision, or rejection. Additional information or clarification may be requested at this stage if necessary. (Estimated processing time: 3 days).
If the manuscript does not meet the format requirements, authors will be asked to revise and resubmit their work. In cases of desk rejection, authors may submit a revised manuscript after addressing the identified issues. Manuscripts that pass the pre-screening are then assigned to a minimum of three reviewers with expertise in the relevant field(s) for formal peer review. (Estimated processing time: 14–21 days).

7. Copyediting and Artwork
Received manuscripts will be checked for a maximum similarity score of 20% and then edited by journal staff for final formatting before publication. (Estimated processing time: 7 days).

8. Proofreading and Final Corrections
The formatted manuscript undergoes Proofreading by the journal staff. A draft of the formatted article is also sent to the author(s) for approval. If no further changes are requested, the article is published. (Estimated processing time: 7 days).

9. Publication
Authors are notified once their manuscript has been published. The estimated time from initial submission to publication is approximately 3–4 months.

Publication Ethics and Malpractice Statement for the Peer-Review Process

Tazkiya: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam is committed to upholding the highest standards of publication ethics and preventing malpractice in the peer-review process. The principles we adhere to are:

  1. Confidentiality: The entire review process is confidential. Editors, reviewers, and relevant parties must maintain the confidentiality of all manuscript-related information.

  2. Objectivity and Impartiality: Reviews are conducted objectively and without bias. Evaluation is based on scholarly merit, relevance, and quality, free from conflicts of interest. Feedback provided should be constructive.

  3. Timeliness: The review process is conducted within a reasonable timeframe. Authors are regularly informed about the status of their manuscript.

  4. Transparency and Accountability: The review process must be transparent and accountable. Reviewers are encouraged to provide clear, evidence-based, and constructive comments. Editorial decisions should be fair and based on reviewer feedback and editorial expertise.

  5. Conflict of Interest: Editors and reviewers must declare any potential conflicts of interest that could affect their objectivity. If a conflict of interest is identified, steps will be taken to ensure an impartial evaluation.

  6. Plagiarism and Misconduct: Editors and reviewers must be vigilant in identifying potential plagiarism, data fabrication, or other research misconduct. Any suspected misconduct must be reported to the relevant authorities.

  7. Reviewer Recognition: Tazkiya: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam values the crucial contribution of peer reviewers. The journal will provide appropriate recognition and appreciation for their dedication to the publication process.

By adhering to these principles, Jurnal Tazkiya: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam is dedicated to maintaining the integrity and credibility of the peer-review process, ensuring fairness, transparency, and ethical conduct in manuscript evaluation, thereby upholding the quality and trustworthiness of the published research.

 

Proofreading Policy

Proofreading Policy

  1. Initial Check by the Author: The author's primary responsibility is to ensure their manuscript is readable and free from writing errors. In certain cases, the editor may request valid proof that a professional proofreader has checked the manuscript.

  2. Selection by the Editorial Board: The manuscript then undergoes a feasibility assessment based on originality, scholarly contribution, and methodology. Only manuscripts deemed "fit" proceed to the next stage.

  3. The Proofreading Stage: The manuscript enters the core proofreading process once declared fit. At this stage, a proofreader (usually from the journal/publisher's side) will meticulously examine the manuscript to find and correct all types of linguistic errors, including:

    • Typographical errors (typos).

    • Spelling and grammatical mistakes.

    • Punctuation and capitalisation.

    • Consistency in formatting and terminology.

  4. Final Objective: The result of this process is a manuscript that is not only high-quality in content (academic/intellectual) but also polished and free from language errors, making it ready for publication to the readers.

 

Author Guidelines

General Information

Jurnal Pedagogik Olahraga is a scientific journal that publishes high-quality research articles, literature reviews, and technical notes in the field of Islamic education. This journal aims to disseminate innovative and significant intellectual contributions to the academic community.

Manuscript Categories
This journal accepts manuscripts in the following categories:

  • Research Articles: Original works that provide substantial contributions to the advancement of knowledge in multidisciplinary studies.

  • Literature Reviews: Critical and comprehensive evaluations of existing literature, highlighting current developments, research gaps, and recommendations for future studies.

Manuscript Preparation
Authors are advised to prepare their manuscripts according to the following guidelines:

1. Title Page
The title page must include:

  • Title: Concise, informative, and reflective of the manuscript's content.

  • Authors: Full name, affiliation, and email address for each author.

  • Abstract: A structured abstract of maximum 250 words containing the research problem, research objectives, research methods, main results, research findings, conclusions, dan The Significance of the Research.

  • Keywords: 3 to 5 keywords that describe the main concepts in the manuscript.

2. Introduction
Clearly describe the background, objectives, and significance of the research. Include the problem statement, a brief literature review, and the research questions or hypotheses.

3. Methods
Explain the methods used in detail to allow for research replication. If referring to existing methods, cite the sources appropriately.

4. Results and Discussion
Present the research findings systematically. Use tables, graphs, or figures to enhance clarity. Discuss the meaning of these findings, compare them with previous research results, and disclose any limitations encountered during the research process.

5. Conclusion
Summarize the main findings and their contribution to the development of knowledge. Provide suggestions for future research without repeating information previously discussed.

6. References
List all sources cited in the manuscript using APA Style format. Ensure the accuracy and completeness of all reference data.

Reference Requirements:

  • Minimum Number: Each manuscript must contain at least 25 references.

  • Sources: At least 50% of all references should come from reputable international journals that have undergone peer review.

  • Self-Citation: Self-citations are permitted but should not exceed three references and must be relevant to the current manuscript.

  • Recency: Prioritize references from the past 10 years to ensure the study's currency and relevance.

Manuscript Submission
Manuscripts should be submitted electronically through the online system available on the journal's official website: https://jurnaltarbiyah.uinsu.ac.id/index.php/tazkiya/index.   Manuscripts must be prepared using Microsoft Word and follow the technical instructions provided.

Peer Review Process
All submitted manuscripts will undergo a rigorous double-blind peer review process to maintain objectivity and publication quality. The identities of both authors and reviewers are kept confidential throughout the evaluation process.

Publication Ethics
This journal is committed to upholding the highest standards of publication ethics. Practices such as plagiarism, data fabrication, and other unethical research conduct are strictly prohibited. Authors must guarantee the originality of their work and provide proper citations for the work of others.

Copyright and Open Access
This journal operates under an open-access policy. Copyright remains with the authors, and published articles are freely accessible to readers.

 

Plagiarism Policy

Policy on Originality and Plagiarism Prevention

  • Originality Requirement: All submitted manuscripts must be original works and free from any form of plagiarism, including self-plagiarism.

  • Screening by Authors: Before submission, authors are strongly advised to check the similarity level of their manuscripts using plagiarism detection software.

  • Screening by the Editorial Team: The journal's editorial team will conduct standard plagiarism checks on every manuscript using Turnitin software.

  • Use of Reference Management: Authors are expected to use a reference management system, such as Mendeley or EndNote, to ensure all citations and references are presented accurately and consistently.

  • Sanctions and Follow-up:

      • Immediate Rejection: Manuscripts with a similarity score 30% will be rejected automatically.

      • Requires Revision: Manuscripts with a similarity score of 25% will be returned to the author for an initial revision.

      • Final Threshold: After revision, the similarity score of the manuscript must be reduced to a maximum of 20% to be processed to the next stage.