EMKONTAN learning model to improve creativity, collaborative skills, and environmental literacy of prospective biology teachers

N. Nurwidodo, Iin Hindun

Abstract


EMKONTAN is a student-centered learning model, which is oriented in creative learning, problem-solving (problem-based learning), collaborative learning, and giving opportunity for students to improve their environmental literacy. This study aims to analyze the validity and practicality of the EMKONTAN model in improving creativity, collaborative skills, and environmental literacy of prospective biology teachers. This study was carried out in the even semester of the academic year of 2020/2021 at IKIP Budi Utomo Malang and Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang. This study involved 150 students in an even semester (Semester II) thru total sampling. Validity instruments used in this study comprised validation sheets for material, method, and media experts. Meanwhile, the instruments for practicality used observation sheets which were focused on the learning implementation, relevant student activities, and obstacles found during the learning processes. The results of the EMKONTAN model indicate that the model has content validity, constructs, and faces that are very feasible to be implemented in the learning process. Additionally, the results of practicality for the EMKONTAN model involve the implementation for each syntax with an average score of <3,6 in a very good category; the students’ activities are in a very active category with the average score of <85%, and the obstacle found is pandemic period; thus, online learning is required. Yet, the risks can decrease the effectiveness of learning. The implication of this research is that the application of the EMKOTAN model in universities by lecturers in related subjects will support efforts to increase environmental literacy for prospective biology teacher students.


Keywords


Collaborative skills; creativity; EMKONTAN; environmental literacy; validity

Full Text:

PDF

References


Afandi, Sajidan, S., Akhyar, M., & Suryani, N. (2018). A framework of integrating environmental science courses based to 21st century skills standards for prospective science teachers. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2014(September), 020032. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5054436

Ahrens, R. de B., Lirani, L. da S., & de Francisco, A. C. (2020). Construct validity and reliability of the work environment assessment instrument WE-10. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(20), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17207364

Akomolafe, C. O. (2015). The classroom environment : A major motivating factor towards high academic performance of senior secondary school students in South West Nigeria. Journal of Education and Practice, 6(34), 17–21.

Amran, A., Perkasa, M., Satriawan, M., Jasin, I., & Irwansyah, M. (2019). Assessing students 21st century attitude and environmental awareness: Promoting education for sustainable development through science education. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1157(2). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1157/2/022025

Anwar, K., & Rizqi, M. A. (2012). Validity and reliability analysis of assessment for customer satisfaction at University of Muhammadiyah Gresik. 141–152.

Ardoin, N. M., Bowers, A. W., & Gaillard, E. (2020). Environmental education outcomes for conservation: A systematic review. Biological Conservation, 241, 108224. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2019.108224

Armstrong, P. (2015). Partnerships and collaboration for school improvement : a review of the evidence October 2015. Research Report, October, 1–47. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/school-improvement-effective-school-partnerships

Aryadoust, V., & Raquel, M. (2019). Quantitative data analysis for language assessment Volume I (p. 288). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315187815

Baumfalk, B., Bhattacharya, D., Vo, T., Forbes, C., Zangori, L., & Schwarz, C. (2019). Impact of model-based science curriculum and instruction on elementary students’ explanations for the hydrosphere. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 56(5), 570–597. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21514

Benedek, M., Jauk, E., Sommer, M., Arendasy, M., & Neubauer, A. C. (2014). Intelligence, creativity, and cognitive control: The common and differential involvement of executive functions in intelligence and creativity. Intelligence, 46, 73–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2014.05.007

Boateng, G. O., Neilands, T. B., Frongillo, E. A., Melgar-Quiñonez, H. R., & Young, S. L. (2018). Best practices for developing and validating scales for health, social, and behavioral research: A primer. Frontiers in Public Health, 6(June), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2018.00149

Bonwell, C., & Eison, J. (1991). Active learning: creating excitement in the classroom. 1991 ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Reports.

Branch, R. M. (2009). Instructional design: The ADDIE approach (1st ed.). Springer US. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-09506-6

Bruner, G. C., & Pomazal, R. J. (1988). Problem recognition: The crucial first stage of the consumer decision process. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 5(1), 53–63. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb008219

Bryson, C. (2016). Engagement through partnership: students as partners in learning and teaching in higher education. International Journal for Academic Development, 21(1), 84–86. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360144x.2016.1124966

Chin, C., & Osborne, J. (2008). Students’ questions: A potential resource for teaching and learning science. Studies in Science Education, 44(1), 1–39. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057260701828101

Chiruguru, S. (2020). The essential skills of 21 st century classroom. March, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.36190.59201

Chotimah, C., & Fathurrohman, M. (2018). Paradigma baru sistem pembelajaran. UIN SATU Tulungagung.

Coyle, K. (2005). Environmental literacy in America: What ten years of NEETF/roper research and related studies say about environmental literacy in the U.S. The National Environmental Education & Training Foundation. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED522820.pdf

Csapó, B., & Funke, J. (2017). The nature of problem solving. Using research to inspire 21st century learning (Issue April). OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264273955-en

Dalida, C. S., Malto, G. A. O., & Lagunzad, C. G. B. (2018). Enhancing students’ environmental knowledge and attitudes through community-based learning. KnE Social Sciences, 3(6), 205. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v3i6.2381

Daly, S. R., Mosyjowski, E. A., Oprea, S. L., Huang-Saad, A., & Seifert, C. M. (2016). College students’ views of creative process instruction across disciplines. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 22, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2016.07.002

Darling-Hammond, L., Flook, L., Cook-Harvey, C., Barron, B., & Osher, D. (2020). Implications for educational practice of the science of learning and development. Applied Developmental Science, 24(2), 97–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888691.2018.1537791

Dörner, D., & Funke, J. (2017). Complex problem solving: What it is and what it is not. Frontiers in Psychology, 8(JUL), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01153

Eison, J. (2010). Using active learning instructional strategies to create excitement and enhance learning. Journal of Medical Education, 59(2), 20. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.456.7986&rep=rep1&type=pdf

Erdoğan, V. (2019). Integrating 4C Skills of 21st century into 4 language skills in EFL classes. International Journal of Education and Research, 7(11), 113–124. www.ijern.com

Erlina, N., Susantini, E., Wasis, Wicaksono, I., & Pandiangan, P. (2018). The effectiveness of evidence-based reasoning in inquiry-based physics teaching to increase students’ scientific reasoning. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 17(6), 972–985. https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/18.17.972

Ernst, J., & Theimer, S. (2011). Evaluating the effects of environmental education programming on connectedness to nature. Environmental Education Research, 17(5), 577–598. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2011.565119

Farwati, R., Permanasari, A., Firman, H., & Suhery, T. (2017). Integrasi problem based learning dalam STEM education berorientasi pada aktualisasi literasi lingkungan dan kreativitas. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pendidikan IPA, 198–206.

Ferronato, N., & Torretta, V. (2019). Waste mismanagement in developing countries: A review of global issues. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(6). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16061060

Fu, L., Zhang, Y., Xiong, X., & Bai, Y. (2018). Pro-environmental awareness and behaviors on campus: Evidence from Tianjin, China. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(1), 427–445. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/77953

García-González, E., Jiménez-Fontana, R., & Goded, P. A. (2020). Approaches to teaching and learning for sustainability: Characterizing students’ perceptions. Journal of Cleaner Production, 274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122928

Gauvain, M. (2018). Collaborative problem solving: Social and developmental considerations. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 19(2), 53–58. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100618813370

Glynn, S. M., & Duit, R. (1996). Learning Science in the Schools Research Reforming Practice. Routledge.

Grover, S. M. (2005). Shaping effective communication skills and therapeutic relationship: The Foundation of Collaboration. AAOHN Journal, 53(4), 177–182.

Gultom, E. (2016). Assessment and evaluation in Efl teaching and learning. Assessment and Evaluation in Efl Teaching and Learning, 190–198.

Gustiani, S. (2020). Students ’ motivation in online learning during Covid-19 pandemic era: A Case study. Holistics Journal, 12(2), 23–40.

Hadzigeorgiou, Y., & Skoumios, M. (2013). The development of environmental awareness through school science: Problems and possibilities. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 8(3), 405–426. https://doi.org/10.12973/ijese.2013.212a

Hasan, R., Lukitasari, M., Utami, S., & Anizar, A. (2019). The activeness, critical, and creative thinking skills of students in the Lesson Study-based inquiry and cooperative learning. JPBI (Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia)/Indonesian Journal of Biology Education, 5(1), 77–84. https://doi.org/10.22219/jpbi.v5i1.7328

Hawley, K. (2018). Creativity and knowledge. Taylor & Francis Group.

Heale, R., & Twycross, A. (2015). Validity and reliability in quantitative studies. Evidence-Based Nursing, 18(3), 66–67. https://doi.org/10.1136/eb-2015-102129

Helms, M. K., Farzaneh, H. H., & Lindemann, U. (2015). Creating bio-inspired solution ideas using biological research articles. In Multidisciplinary Contributions to the Science of Creative Thinking. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-618-8_13

Herrington, J., Parker, J., & Boase-Jelinek, D. (2014). Connected authentic learning: Reflection and intentional learning. Australian Journal of Education, 58(1), 23–35. https://doi.org/10.1177/0004944113517830

Hines, M. E., Catalana, S. M., & Anderson, B. N. (2019). When learning sinks in: using the incubation model of teaching to guide students through the creative thinking process. Gifted Child Today, 42(1), 36–45. https://doi.org/10.1177/1076217518804858

Hossain, M. I. (2015). Teaching productive skills to the students: A secondary level scenario. BRAC University.

Husamah, H. (2015). Thinking skills for environmental sustainability perspective of new students of biology education department through blended project based learning model. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 4(2), 110–119. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v4i2.3878

Husamah, H., Miharja, F., J., & Hidayati, D., A. (2020). Environmental literacy of Islamic boarding school students: Study in MA Bilingual-Sidoarjo, East Java, Indonesia. Prisma Sains: Jurnal Pengkajian Ilmu dan Pembelajaran Matematika dan IPA IKIP Mataram, 8(1), 57-68. https://doi.org/10.33394/j-ps.v8i1.2766

Husamah, H., Suwono, H., Nur, H., & Dharmawan, A. (2022). The development and validation of environmental literacy instrument based on spirituality for prospective science teachers. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 18(12), em2206. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/12732

Husamah, H., Rahardjanto, A., Hadi, S., Lestari, N., & Ummah BK., M. K. (2023). Spirituality based environmental literacy among prospective biology teacher in Indonesia: Analysis based on gender, accreditation, and semester-level aspects. JPBI (Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia), 9(3), 418-432. https://doi.org/10.22219/jpbi.v9i3.2 9500

Husamah, H., Rahardjanto, A., Hadi, S., & Lestari, N. (2024). What are the valuable lessons from global research on environmental literacy in the last two decades? A systematic literature review. Biosfer: Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi, 17(1), 172–195. https://doi.org/10.21009/biosferjpb.37491

Husamah H., Adlini, M. N., Luzyawati, L., & Lestari, N. (2024). Trends and coverage of strengthening literacy in biology learning: Systematic literature review of the Scopus database in four decades. Jurnal Biolokus: Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Biologi dan Biologi, 7(1), 19-38. http://dx.doi.org/10.30821/biolokus.v7i1.3550

Ichsan, I. Z., Sigit, D. V., Miarsyah, M., Azrai, E. P., & Heryanti, E. (2019). Students’ pro-environmental behavior and environmental learning outcomes based on green consumerism. Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia, 5(1), 109–116. https://doi.org/10.22219/jpbi.v5i1.6447

Jatmiko, B., Widodo, W., Budiyanto, M., & Wicaksono, I. (2015). Inqf-Based Learning on a General Physics for Improving Student ’ S Learning Outcomes. Journal of Baltic Science Educatioan, 15(4), 441–451. http://www.scientiasocialis.lt/jbse/files/pdf/vol15/441-451.Jatmiko_JBSE_Vol.15_No.4.pdf

Jianping, L., Minrong, L., Jinnan, W., Jianjian, L., Hongwen, S., & Maoxing, H. (2014). Global environmental issues and human wellbeing. In L. Jianping, L. Minrong, W. Jinnan, L. Jianjian, S. Hongwen, & H. Maoxing (Eds.), Report on Global Environmental Competitiveness (2013) (urrent Chi, pp. 3–21). Springer Berlin Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-54678-5_1

Joshi, Y., & Rahman, Z. (2015). Factors affecting green purchase behaviour and future research directions. International Strategic Management Review, 3(1), 128–143. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ism.2015.04.001

Karimzadegan, H., & Meiboudia, H. (2012). Exploration of environmental literacy in science education curriculum in primary schools in Iran. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 46, 404–409. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.05.131

Keiler, L. S. (2018). Teachers’ roles and identities in student-centered classrooms. International Journal of STEM Education, 5(34), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-018-0131-6

Kim, M. K., Roh, I. S., & Cho, M. K. (2016). Creativity of gifted students in an integrated math-science instruction. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 19, 38–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2015.07.004

Kim, S., Raza, M., & Seidman, E. (2019). Improving 21st-century teaching skills: The key to effective 21st-century learners. Research in Comparative and International Education, 14(1), 99–117. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745499919829214

Larraz-Rábanos, N. (2021). Development of creative thinking skills in the teaching-learning process. In Teacher Education - New Perspectives. IntechOpen. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.97780

Lee, S. M., & Trimi, S. (2018). Innovation for creating a smart future. Journal of Innovation and Knowledge, 3(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2016.11.001

Lin-Siegler, X., Ahn, J. N., Chen, J., Fang, F. F. A., & Luna-Lucero, M. (2016). Even einstein struggled: Effects of learning about great scientists’ struggles on high school students’ motivation to learn science. Journal of Educational Psychology, 108(3), 314–328. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000092

Lind, J., Pelger, S., & Jakobsson, A. (2020). Students’ knowledge of emerging technology and sustainability through a design activity in technology education. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 32(1), 243–266. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-020-09604-y

Little, J. W. (2007). Professional communication and collaboration. The Keys to Effective Schools: Educational Reform as Continuous Improvement, Second Edition, 51–66. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781483329512.n4

Lodge, J. M., Kennedy, G., Lockyer, L., Arguel, A., & Pachman, M. (2018). Understanding difficulties and resulting confusion in learning: An integrative review. Frontiers in Education, 3(June), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2018.00049

Loeng, S. (2020). Self-directed learning: A core concept in adult education. Education Research International, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/3816132

Manuel, J. (2021). Reliability, validity and practicality. In EnglishPost.org. https://englishpost.org/reliability-validity-and-practicality/

Mardiani, N. D., Husamah, H., Fatmawati, D., Miharja, F. J., & Fauzi, A. (2021). Environmental literacy of students in al-rifa’ie modern Islamic Boarding School, Malang Regency-Indonesia based on gender differences and parents’ occupation. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains Indonesia, 9(2), 317–328. https://doi.org/10.24815/jpsi.v9i2.19316

Mauliya, I., Relianisa, R. Z., & Rokhyati, U. (2020). Lack of motivation factors creating poor academic performance in the context of graduate English Department Students. Linguists : Journal Of Linguistics and Language Teaching, 6(2), 73. https://doi.org/10.29300/ling.v6i2.3604

McBride, B.B., Brewer, C.A., Berkowitz, A.R., & Borrie, W.T. (2013). Environmental literacy, ecological literacy, ecoliteracy: What do we mean and how did we get here? Ecosphere, 4(5), 67. https://doi.org/10.1890/ES13-00075.1

Meilinda, H., Prayitno, B. A., Maret, U. S., Karyanto, P., & Maret, U. S. (2017). Student ’ s environmental literacy profile of adiwiyata green school in student ’ s environmental literacy profile of adiwiyata green school in Surakarta, Indonesia. August. https://doi.org/10.11591/edulearn.v11i3.6433

Milrad, M. (2013). Designing an interactive learning environment to support children ’ s understanding in complex domains September 1999.

Milrad, M. (1999). Designing an Interactive learning environment to support children ’ s understanding in complex domains. EdMedia + Innovate Learning, September 1999, 1–179.

Moulton, E., Bradbury, K., Barton, M., & Fein, D. (2019). Factor analysis of the childhood autism rating scale in a sample of two year olds with an autism spectrum disorder. J Autism Dev Disord., 49(7), 2733–2746. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-016-2936-9

Muhdhar, M. H. I. A., Wardhani, Y. S., Prasetyo, T. I., Sumberartha, I. W., Mardiyanti, L., & Supriatin, S. W. (2021). Improved collaborative skills and environmental literacy through the E-UKBM of surrounding nature exploration. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2330(March). https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0043097

Munawaroh. (2017). The influence of teaching methods and learning environment to the student’s learning achievement of craft and entrepreneurship subjects at vocational high school. international Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 12(4), 665–678.

Mustami, M. K., Syamsudduha, S., Safei, & Ismail, M. I. (2019). Validity, practicality, and effectiveness development of biology textbooks integrated with augmented reality on high school students. In International Journal of Technology Enhanced Learning (Vol. 11, Issue 2, pp. 187–200). https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTEL.2019.098789

Needhidasan, S., Samuel, M., & Chidambaram, R. (2014). Electronic waste - An emerging threat to the environment of urban India. Journal of Environmental Health Science and Engineering, 12(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1186/2052-336X-12-36

Nieveen, N. (1999). Prototyping to Reach Product Quality. In T. Plomp, N. Nieveen, K. Gustafson, R. M. Branch, & J. van den Akker (Eds.), Design approaches and tools in education and training. London: Kluwer Academic Publisher.

Nugraheni, E. (2014). Pengantar Ilmu Lingkungan. In Pengetahuan Dasar Ilmu Lingkungan. Universitas Terbuka.

Nurwidodo, N., Hadi, S., Ibrohim, I., & Sueb, S. (2021). Validity and practicality of the EMKONTAN learning model to improve creative thinking, collaborative and literacy environment of prospective biology teacher students. The 12th International Conference on Lesson Study (ICLS-XII), 221–232. https://jurnal.unimus.ac.id/index.php/psn12012010/article/download/9015/6048

Nurwidodo, N., Romdaniyah, S. W., Sudarmanto, S., Rosanti, D., Kurniawati, K., & Abidin, Z. (2021). Analisis profil berpikir kritis, kreatif, keterampilan kolaboratif, dan literasi lingkungan siswa kelas 8 SMP Muhammadiyah sebagai impak pembelajaran modern. Bioscientist: Jurnal Ilmiah Biologi, 9(2), 605–619. https://doi.org/10.33394/bioscientist.v9i2.4642

OECD. (2019). PISA 2021 creative thinking framework. Oecd, 53(9), 1689–1699. https://www.oecd.org/pisa/publications/PISA-2021-creative-thinking-framework.pdf

Orr, M. T., Pecheone, R., Snyder, J. D., Murphy, J., Palanki, A., Beaudin, B., Hollingworth, L., & Buttram, J. L. (2018). Performance assessment for principal licensure: evidence from content and face validation and bias review. Journal of Research on Leadership Education, 13(2), 109–138. https://doi.org/10.1177/1942775117701179

Papaleontiou- Louca, E., Varnava-Marouchou, D., Mihai, S., & Konis, E. (2014). Teaching for creativity in universities. Journal of Education and Human Development, 3(4), 131–154. https://doi.org/10.15640/jehd.v3n4a13

Partnership for 21st Century Skills. (2015). P21 Framework Definitions. Partnership for 21st Century Skills. http://www.p21.org/our-work/p21-framework

Pedaste, M., Mäeots, M., Siiman, L. A., de Jong, T., van Riesen, S. A. N., Kamp, E. T., Manoli, C. C., Zacharia, Z. C., & Tsourlidaki, E. (2015). Phases of inquiry-based learning: Definitions and the inquiry cycle. Educational Research Review, 14, 47–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2015.02.003

Perdiawan, Z., & Kartini, K. (2021). Efektivitas model pembelajaran environmental learning terhadap motivasi dan hasil belajar siswa. Binomia, 4(2), 109–124.

Pereira, J. C. (2015). Environmental issues and international relations, a new global disorder. Journal of Ecosystem & Ecography, 58(1), 191–209. https://doi.org/10.1590/0034-7329201500110

Peters-burton, E. E., & Stehle, S. M. (2019). Developing student 21 st Century skills in selected exemplary inclusive STEM high schools. International Journal of STEM Education, 1, 1–15.

Plomp, T., & Nieveen, N. (2013). Educational design research educational design research. Netherlands Institute for Curriculum Development: SLO, 1–206. http://www.eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/recordDetail?accno=EJ815766

Price, P. C., Jhangiani, R., & Chiang, I.-C. A. (2015). Reliability and validity of measurement – Research methods in psychology (2nd Ed.). BCcampus. https://opentextbc.ca/researchmethods/chapter/reliability-and-validity-of-measurement/

Richard P. Bagozzi, Y. Y. and L. W. P. (2013). Bogazzi_Assesing construct validity in organiational research. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36(3), 421–458. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2393203

Rico, M. N. (1998). Gender, the environment and the sustainability of development. United Nations.

Saleh, H. (2019). Convergent and divergent thinking in problem solving (Case study on junior high school students). International Journal of Insights for Mathematics Teaching (IJOIMT), 2(1), 11–21. http://journal2.um.ac.id/index.php/ijoimt/article/view/7119

Samson, P. L. (2015). Fostering student engagement: Creative problem-solving in small group facilitations. Collected Essays on Learning and Teaching, 8, 153. https://doi.org/10.22329/celt.v8i0.4227

Sandoval, W. (2014). Conjecture mapping: An approach to systematic educational design research. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 23(1), 18–36. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2013.778204

Santoso, B., Marchira, C. R., & Sumarni, P. (2017). Development and validity and reliability tests of professionalism assessment instrument in psychiatry residents. Jurnal Pendidikan Kedokteran Indonesia: The Indonesian Journal of Medical Education, 6(1), 60. https://doi.org/10.22146/jpki.25369

Schmitz, M. J., & Winskel, H. (2008). Towards effective partnerships in a collaborative problem-solving task. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 78(4), 581–596. https://doi.org/10.1348/000709908X281619

Serdyukov, P. (2017). Innovation in education: What works, what doesn’t, and what to do about it? Journal of Research in Innovative Teaching & Learning, 10(1), 4–33. https://doi.org/10.1108/jrit-10-2016-0007

Shao, Y., Zhang, C., Zhou, J., Gu, T., & Yuan, Y. (2019). How does culture shape creativity? A mini-review. Frontiers in Psychology, 10(MAY). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01219

Sibiya, M. N. (2018). Effective Communication in Nursing. IntechOpen. https://www.intechopen.com/books/nursing/effective-communication-in-nursing

Soller, A. (2001). Supporting social interaction in an intelligent collaborative learning system. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 12.

Song, X., Cong, Y., Song, Y., Chen, Y., & Liang, P. (2021). A bearing fault diagnosis model based on CNN with wide convolution kernels. Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12652-021-03177-x

Sternberg, R. J. (2018). The nature of human intelligence. In American Educational Research Journal. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316817049

Sulistyani, U. N. L. (2018). The Importance of needs analysis in a language curriculum development : An evaluation to 2013 curriculum. UHAMKA International Conference on ELT and CALL (UICELL), November, 143–152.

Sumarmi, Aliman, M., & Mutia, T. (2021). The effect of digital eco-learning in student worksheet flipbook to environmental project literacy and pedagogic competency. Journal of Technology and Science Education, 11(2), 357–370. https://doi.org/10.3926/jotse.1175

Sun, M., Wang, M., & Wegerif, R. (2020). Effects of divergent thinking training on students’ scientific creativity: The impact of individual creative potential and domain knowledge. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 37(July). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100682

Taconis, R., Ferguson-Hessler, M. G. M., & Broekkamp, H. (2001). Teaching science problem solving: an overview of experimental work. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38, 442–468. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed078p1162

Tharayil, S., Borrego, M., Prince, M., Nguyen, K. A., Shekhar, P., Finelli, C. J., & Waters, C. (2018). Strategies to mitigate student resistance to active learning. International Journal of STEM Education, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-018-0102-y

Wehmeyer, M. L., Shogren, K. A., Palmer, S. B., Williams-Diehm, K. L., Little, T., & Boulton, A. (2012). Impact of the self-determined learning model of instruction on self-determination: A Randomized-trial control group study. Exceptional Children, 78(2), 135–153. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440291207800201

Wicaksono, I., Jatmiko, B., & Prastowo, T. (2015). Pengembangan perangkat pembelajaran fisika model learning cycle 5E untuk meningkatkan pemahaman konsep siswa pada materi fluida statis. JPPS (Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Sains), 4(2), 518. https://doi.org/10.26740/jpps.v4n2.p518-524

Wicaksono, I., Wasis, & Madlazim. (2017). The effectiveness of virtual science teaching model (VS-TM) to improve student’s scientific creativity and concept mastery on senior high school physics subject. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 16(4), 549–561. https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/17.16.549

Wong, C. A., Afandi, S. H. M., Ramachandran, S., Kunasekaran, P., & Chan, J. K. L. (2018). Conceptualizing environmental literacy and factors affecting pro-environmental behaviour. International Journal of Business and Society, 19(S1), 128–139.

Wu, E., Cheng, J., & Zhang, J. (2020). Study on the environmental education demand and environmental literacy assessment of citizens in sustainable urban construction in Beijing. Sustainability, 12(241), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12010241




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30821/biolokus.v7i2.3814

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2024 Jurnal Biolokus: Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Biologi dan Biologi

indexed by :