Muhamamad Ari Syaputra


This study focuses on the management face in the conversation in the croods movie. This study was aimed at identifying a face management which is defined as any interaction word that is generally related to politeness. politeness is seen as a feature of interpersonal conduct whereby a person ‘shows regard for another person by trying to make that person feel comfortable or by making an obvious effort to avoid making that person feel uncomfortable’. Politeness is a feature of interpersonal conduct centered on the concept of face. The concept of face to a certain extent determines how a conversation can be conducted efficiently, effectively, and politely. This is descriptive and qualitative study is done under the scope of pragmatics that is implements theory of management face proposed by Goffman. It can be divide into two face; positive and negative face. The concepts of face in “the croods movie” discourse yield two concept namely positive and negative concepts. Positive face is the need to be accepted, even liked by others, to be treated as a member of the group and to know that his or her wants are shared by others. Negative face is the need to be independent to have a freedom of action and not to be imposed by others. The data obtained through movie of the croods with duration one half hour. After collecting the data, the writer identified and classified the data which are needed from the conversation specifically indicated positive and negative face. The finding of the study shows that are many conversation indicated positive and negative face, in this paper the writer only show five evident that showed to indicate positive and negative face.

Full Text:



Afiyati, A. 2013. Politeness Principle as Seen in The Dialogue Between Characters on “KARATE KID” Movie. English Department of Education Faculty State Institute of Islamic Studies (STAIN)

SALATIGA Unpublished Thesis

Allen, R.C., & Gomery, D.1993. Film History: Theory and Practice. NewYork: Mc Graw Hill

Ambuyo, B.A. 2011. Face Threatening Acts and Standing Orders: ‘Politeness’ or ‘politics' in the Question Time Discussions of the Kenyan Parliament. International Journal of Humanities and

Social Science Vol. I No. 9

Amberg, J.S & Vause, D.J. 2010. American English History, Structure, and Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Başaran, B.C. 2013. Laughter as a Face Management Device In Turkish: Evidence From Turkish Spoken Corpus. Journal of Linguistics and Literature, Vol X. No.2. 10:2, P.75-100

Brown, P & Levinson, S.C. 1987. Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.

Culpeper, J.2011. Politeness and Impoliteness. In: Karin Aijmer and Gisle Andersen (eds.) Sociopragmatics, Volume 5 of Handbooks of Pragmatics edited by Wolfram Bublitz, Andreas H.

Jucker and Klaus P. Schneider. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 391-436

Creswell, J. W. 2002. Research design Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed methods Approaches 2nd

Edition. USA: Sage Publication, inc.

Goffman, E. 1967. Interaction Ritual: Essays on face-to-face behavior. New York, NY: Doubleday Anchor.

Haugh, M. & Michael, C,H. 2003. A Metalinguistic Approach to Deconstructing the Concepts of 'Face' and 'Politeness' in Chinese, English and Japanese. Journal of Pragmatics Vol XXXV. No. 10/11: P. 1581-1611

Haugh, M. 2007. The Discursive Challenge to Politeness Theory: an Interactional Alternative. Journal of Politeness Research, Vol III. P. 295–317.

Holmes, J. 2005. Politeness and Postmodernism - an Appropriate Approach to the Analysis of Language and Gender? Journal of Sociolinguistics. Vol IX. No.1 P. 108-117.

Holmet, J. 2013. An Introduction to Sociolinguistic 6th Edition. London and New York: Long Man.

Kedveš, A. 2013. Face Threatening Acts and Politeness Strategies in Summer School Application Calls. Vol XIV. No.2-3 P. 431-444

Keyton, J. (2011). Communication and organizational culture: A key to understanding work experience. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage

Khorshidi, Hassan Rasouli. 2013. Politeness in Study Abroad. International Research Journal of Applied and Basic Sciences. Vol, V. No.3. P 324-333. S

Levinson, S.C. 1983. Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Mey, L. Jacob. 1993. Pragmatics – An Introduction. Oxford: Blackwell

Suzila, T.I & Yusri, M. N. 2012. Politeness: Adolescents in Disagreements. International Journal of Social Science and Humanity, Vol. II, No. 2

Thomas, J. 1996. Meaning in interaction: an introduction to pragmatics. London and New York: Longman

Widdowson, H.G. 1978. Teaching Language Communication. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Vilkki, L.2006. Politeness, Face and Facework: Current Issues. SKY Journal of Linguistic. Vol XIX.P.322-332

Yule, G. 1996. Pragmatics. London: Oxford University Press



  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2020 VISION

Indexing and Abstracting: