INSTRUMEN PENILAIAN TERINTEGRASI : PENGUKURAN KEMAMPUAN BERPIKIR KRITIS DAN KETERAMPILAN SAINS SISWA PADA MATERI LARUTAN ELEKTROLIT DAN NONELEKTROLIT

Sri Rejeki Dwi Astuti, Anggi Ristiyana Puspita Sari, Rizki Nor Amelia, Karlinda Karlinda

Abstract


This study aimed to explore the characteristics of the tests used in measuring students' abilities such as item fit, item difficulty level, and test reliability and to measure students’ ability in electrolyte test takers' reliability, and person misfit. This research involved 260 students from two senior high schools in Bantul, Yogyakarta. The research instruments was integrated assessment instrument for electrolyte and nonelectrolyte solution matter consisted of 8 essay question. The data were analyzed with Rasch model using Winstep software version 3.73. The results revealed that all items on the integrated assessment instrument have been proven to be fit with Rasch model, have good test reliability, and have good difficulty level parameters. Moreover, students' abilities were obtained very diverse, i.e. very low, low, medium, high and very high abilities. Meanwhile, the person reliability were very low and 48 students were identified as person misfit . Thus, further examination can be conducted, so that students who are identified as misfit s can obtain guidance from the teacher.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Adedoyin, O. O., & Mokobi, T. (2013). Using IRT Psychometric Analysis in Examining The Quality of Junior Certificate Mathematic Multiple Choice Examination Test Items. International Journal of Asian Social Science, 3(4), 992-1011.

Amelia, R. N., Sari, A. R., & Astuti, S. R. (2021). Chemistry learning outcomes assessment: How is the quality of the tests made by the teacher? Journal of Educational Chemistry, 3(1), 11-22. doi:http://10.21580/jec.2021.3.1.6582

Astuti, S. R., Suyanta, Widjajanti, E., & Rohaeti, E. (2017). An integrated assessment instrument: Developing and validating instrument for facilitating critical thinking abilities and science process skills on electrolyte and nonelectrolyte solution matter. AIP Conference Proceedings (pp. 050007-1–050007-6). College Park: AIP Publishing.

Austin, A. C., Ben-Daat, H., Zhu, M., Atkinson, R., Barrows, N., & Gould, I. R. (2015). Measuring student performance in general. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 16(1), 168-178. doi:https://doi.org/10.1039/C4RP00208C

Baker, F. B. (2001). The basic of item response theory. Nwe York: ERIC Clearinghouse on Assessment and Evaluation.

Balistreri, S., Di Giacomo, F., Noisette, I., & Ptak, T. (2012). Global education: Connections, concepts, and careers. New York: College Board.

Bond, T. G., & Fox, C. M. (2015). Applying the rasch model fundamental measurement in the human sciences third edition. New York: Routledge.

Brookhart, S. M. (2010). How to assess higher-order thinking skills in your classroom. Alexandria: ASCD.

Chebii, R., Wachanga, S., & Kiboss, J. (2012). Effects of Science Process Skills Mastery Learning Approach on Students’ Acquisition of Selected Chemistry Practical Skills in School. Creative Education, 3(8), 1291-1296.

Darmaji, D., Kurniawan, D. A., & Irdianti, I. (2019). Physics education students’ science process skills. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 8(2), 293-298. doi:http://10.11591/ijere.v8i2.28646

Hambleton, R. K., & Swaminathan, H. (1985). Item Response Theory. New York: Kluwer Inc.

Ismail, Z. H., & Jusoh, I. (2001). Relationship between science process skills and logical thinking abilities of malaysian students. Journal of Science and Mathematics Education in S.E Asia, xxiv(2), 67-77.

Judge, B., Jones, P., & McCreery, E. (2009). Critical thinking skills for education students. London: Learning Matters Ltd.

Karabatsos, G. (2003). Comparing the abberant response detection performance of thirty-six person-fit statistics. Applied Measurement in Education, 16(4), 277-298. doi:https://doi.org/10.1207/S15324818AME1604_2

Keil, C., Haney, J., & Zoffel, J. (2009). Improvements in student achievement and science process skills using environmental health science problem-based learning curricula. Electronic Journal of Science Education, 13(1), 1-18.

Kemendikbud. (2013). Permendikbud Nomor 66 tahun 2013 tentang Standar Penilaian Pendidikan. Jakarta: Kemendikbud.

Li, J., & Klahr, D. (2006). The psychology of scientific thinking: Implications for science teaching and learning. In J. Rhoton, & P. Shane, Teaching Science in the 21st Century (p. 2). Arlington: NSTA Press.

Linacre, J. M. (2002). What do infit and outfit mean-square and standardized. Rasch Measurement Transaction, 16(2), 878.

Linacre, J. M. (2004). Test Validity and Rasch Measurement: Construct, Content, etc. asch Measurement Transactions, 18(1), 970-971.

Mahapoonyanont, N., Krahomwong, R., Kochakornjarupong, D., & Rachasong, W. (2010). Critical thinking abilities assessment tools: reliability generalization. Procedia Social and Behavioral Science (pp. 434–438). Amsterdam: Elsevier.

Marasigan, A. C., & Espinosa, A. A. (2014). Modified Useful-Learning Approach: Effects on Students‘ Critical Thinking Skills and Attitude towards Chemistry. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 1(1), 35-72.

Marzano, R. J. (2007). The art of science teaching. Alexandria: ASDC.

Meijer, R. R. (1996). Person-fit research: an introduction. Applied Measurement in Education, 9(1), 3-8. doi:https://doi.org/10.1207/s15324818ame0901_2

Meijer, R. R., & Sitsma, K. (2001). Person fit statistic: What is their purpose? Rasch Measurement Transactions, 15(2), 823.

Mutisya, S. M., Too, J. K., & Rotich. (2014). Performance in Science Process Skills: The Influence of Subject Specialization. Asian Journal of Social Science & Humanities, 3(1), 179-188.

Rauf, R. A., Rasul, M. S., Mansor, A. N., Othman, Z., & Lyndon, N. (2013). Inculcation of science process skills in a science classroom. Asian Social Science, 9(8), 47-57.

Razak, N. b., Khairani, A. Z., & Thien, L. M. (2012). Examining quality of mathemtics test items using rasch model: Preminarily analysis . Procedia Social Behavioral Science (pp. 2205 – 2214). Amsterdam: Elsevier.

Rumahlatu, D., Sangur, K., & Liline, S. (2020). The effect of complex instruction team product (CITP) learning model on increase student’s skills. International Journal of Instruction, 13(1), 587-606.

Rusmini , Suyono, & Agustini , R. (2021). Analysis of science process skills of chemical education students through self-project based learning (SJBL) in the covid-19 pandemic era. Journal of Technology and Science Education, 11(2), 371-387. doi:https://doi.org/10.3926/jotse.1288

Saribaz, D., & Bayram, H. (2009). Is it possible to improve science process skills and attitudes towards chemistry through the development of metacognitive skills embedded within a motivated chemistry lab?: A self-regulate learning approach. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences (pp. 61-72). Amsterdam: Elsevier.

Schulz, H., & Fit zPatrick, B. (2016). Teachers’ understandings of critical and higher order thinking and what this means for their teaching and assessments. Alberta Journal of Educational Research, 62(1), 61-86.

Smith, E. V. (2001). vidence for the reliability of measures and validity of measure interpretation: A Rasch measurement perspective. Journal of Applied Measurement, 2(3), 281-311.

Sumintono, B., & Widhiarso, W. (2015). Aplikasi pemodelan rasch pada asessment pendidikan. Cimahi : Trim Komunikata Publishing House.

Taber , K. S. (2018). The use of cronbach’s alpha when developing and reporting research instruments in science education. Research in Science Education, 48, 1273–1296.

Tavakol, M., & Dennick, R. (2011). Making sense of cronbach’s alpha. International Journal of Medical Education, 2, 53-55. doi:DOI: 10.5116/ijme.4dfb.8dfd

Tosun, C., & Taskesenligil, Y. (2013). The effect of problem-based learning on undergraduate students' learning about solution and their physical properties and scientific processing skills. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 14(1), 36-50. doi:https://doi.org/10.1039/C2RP20060K

Yasin, R. M., Yunus, F. A., Che Rus, R., Ahmad, A., & Rahim, M. B. (2015). Validity and reliability learning transfer item using rasch measurement model. Procedia Social and Behavioral Science (pp. 212 – 217). Amsterdam: Elsevier.

Zhou, Q., Huang, Q., & Tian, H. (2013). Developing Students’ Critical Thinking Skills by Task-Based Learning in Chemistry Experiment Teaching. Crative Education, 4(12A), 40-45.

Zoller, U. (2001). Alternative assessment as (critical) means of facilitating HOCS-promoting teaching and learning in chemistry education. Chemistry Education Research and Practice in Europe, 2(1), 9-17.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30829/tar.v29i2.1858

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


CURRENT INDEXING
 

 

Creative Commons License

Jurnal Tarbiyah by UIN Sumatera Utara Medan is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Based on a work at http://jurnaltarbiyah.uinsu.ac.id/index.php/tarbiyah.
Permissions beyond the scope of this license may be available at http://jurnaltarbiyah.uinsu.ac.id/index.php/tarbiyah/about/submissions#copyrightNotice.