Student argumentation skills’ analysis on the discussion of socio-scientific issues in the concept of viruses

Yuke Mardiati, Yanti Herlanti, Alfi Lailatul Qodriyah

Abstract


This study aimed to analyze the argumentation skills of students in learning through discussion of socio-scientific issues with the concept of viruses. This research is descriptive which describes the quality of oral and written arguments. The research was conducted in class of  X MIPA at SMAN Jakarta. There were 34 students involved in this study. The method of analysis to determine the pattern of arguments used is the Toulmin Analysis. The analysis of collaborative oral arguments in class used Erduran's analysis framework. Meanwhile, the quality of individual written argumentation was Dawson and Venville's analysis. The results showed that the quality of students' oral arguments reached level 5. This means that students have been able to make a claim accompanied by a warrant and rebuttal quite well. The quality of the students' written arguments reaches levels 2 and 3. This means that students' arguments consist of arguments in the form of claims (claims) accompanied by guarantors of claims (warrants) and evidence (data) and rebuttals that are still weak.. The augmentation process verbally and collaboratively in class has reached the highest level, but individually and in writing it is still at a moderate level.

Keywords


discussion; socio-scientific issues; oral argumentation; written argumentation

Full Text:

PDF

References


Amalia, N.F., Riandi, Widodo, A., & Rochintaniawati, D. (2018). Kompleksitas argumentasi berbasis isu sosiosaintifik pada jenjang SD, SMP, dan SMA. Assimilation: Journal of Biology Education, 1(1), 29-32.

Anisa, A., Widodo, A., & Riandi, R. (2017). Argumentation quality of socio-scientific issue between high school students and postgraduate students about cancer. Journal of Physics, Conference Series 895 012165. 10.1088/1742-6596/895/1/012160

Atwood, S., Tumbull, W., & Carpendale, J.I.M. (2010). The construction of knowledge in calssroom talk. Journal of Learning Sciences, 19(3), 358-402.

Bahri, H., Pallenari M., & Ali, A. (2021). Profil Kemampuan argumentasi siswa SMA pada pembelajaran biologi. Jurnal Biology Teaching and Learning, 4(1), 85-91.

Dawson, V., & Venville, G.J. (2009). High-school students informal reasoning and argumentation about biotechnology: an indicator of scientific literacy?. International Journal of Science Education, 1(11), 1421-1455.

Defni, S., Fadilah M., Lufri, Yuniarti, E., Janiarti. (2022). Analisis kebutuhan pengembangan instrumen penilaian kemampuan argumentasi ilmiah peserta didik terintegrasi isu sosio-saintifik dalam pembelajaran biologi. Ruang-Ruang Kelas: Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi, 2(1), 96-103.

Devi, N.D.C., Susanti E., & Indriyanti, N.Y. (2018). Analisis kemampuan argumentasi siswa SMA pada materi larutan penyangga. Jurnal Kimia dan Pendidikan Kimia (JKPK), 3(3), 152-159.

Espeja, A.G., & Lagarón, D.C. (2015). Socio-scientific issues (SSI) in initial training of primary teachers: Pre-service teachers’ conceptualization of SSI and appreciation of the value of teaching SSI. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 196, 80-88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.07.015

Herawati, D., Istiana, R., & Ardianto, R. (2019). Membangun keterampilan argumentasi mahasiswa melalui model pembelajaran argumentation real world inquiry. Journal of Education and Practise, 3(2), 70-76.

Herlanti, Y. (2014). Analisis argumentasi mahasiswa pendidikan biologi pada isu sosiosaintifik konsumsi Genetically Modified Organism (GMO). Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 3(1), 51-59.

Indriani, T., & Jayanti, U.N.A.D. 2022. Interctive socio-scientific: The effects on creative thinking skills. Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA, 23(3), 995-1005.

Istiana, R., Herawati, D., Nadiroh, & Mahendra, P.R.A. (2019). Efektivitas problem based learning terhadap keterampilan argumentasi mahasiswa tentang isu sosiosaintifik lingkungan. Edusains, 11(2), 286-296.

Khishfe, R. (2017). Consistency of nature of science views across scientific and socio-scientific contexts. International Journal of Science Education, 39(4), 403-432.

Kristiana, T., Afandi, & Wahyuni, E.S. (2019). Potensi sosioscientific issue dalam memberdayakan kemampuan berpikir kritis siswa. Prosiding Seminar Nasional FKIP Tanjungpura Pontianak.

Martini, Widodo, W., Qosyim A., Mahdiannur M.A., & Jatmiko, B. (2021). Improving undergraduate science education students argumentation skills through debate socioscientific issues. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 10(3), 428-438.

Mazfufah, N.F., Herlanti, Y., & Mardiati, Y. (2017). Increasing scientific reasoning through discussion of virus in scientific and socioscientific. Proceedings of the International Conference on Education in Muslim Society (ICEMS 2017).

Pursitasari I.D.,Alfitriyani N.,& Kurniasih S. (2022). Enchancing students’s creative thinking skills through biotechnology module based socio-saintific issues. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 8(2), 939–948. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v8i2.1438

Rachmawati, R.C., & Diningsih, E. (2021). Pengenalan sosio scientific issue secara daring terhadap kemampuan penalaran siswa. Media Penelitian : Jurnal Penelitian dalam Bidang Pendidikan dan Pengajaran, 15(1), 31-36.

Rahayu, S. (2015). Meningkatkan profesionalisme guru dalam mewujudkan literasi sains siswa melalui pembelajaran kimia/ipa berkonteks isu-isu sosiosaintifik (Socioscientific Issues). Prosiding Seminar Nasional Kimia & Sains, Universitas Negeri Malang.

Rahman. (2020). Argumentative skill: Sebuah hasil dari proses pembelajaran melalui model inquary pada siswa madrasah aliyah. Jurnal Pendidikan Geografi Undiksha, 8(3), 110-118.

Rifa’i, R.M., & Subiantoro AW. (2022). Kelayakan web pembelajaran biologi berbasis socio- scientific issues topik sistem pernafasan untuk pengembangan literasi kesehatan siswa. Didaktika Biologi: Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Biologi, 6(1), 31-41.

Sadler, T.D. (2011). Socio-scientific issues in the classroom: teaching, learning and research. Springer.

Siska, Triani W., Yunita, Maryuningsih Y., & Ubaidillah, M. (2020). Penerapan pembelajaran berbasis socio scientific issues untuk meningkatkan kemampuan argumentasi ilmiah. Jurnal Edusains, 8(1), 22-32.

Subiantoro, A.W., Ariyanti, N.A., & Sulistyo. (2013). Pembelajaran materi ekosistem dengan sosio-saintifik issues dan pengaruhnya dengan reflective judgement siswa. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 2(1), 41-47.

Syaifudin, A., & Utami, S.P.T. (2011). Penalaran argumen siswa dalam wacana tulis argumentasi sebagai upaya membudayakan berpikir kritis di SMA. Jurnal Bahasa dan Sastra, 7(1), 65-76.

Zaini, H. (2014). Karakteristik kurikulum 2013 dan kurikulum tingkat satuan pendidikan (KTSP). Jurnal Idaroh, 1(1), 15-31.

Zeidler, D.L., & Nichols, B.H. (2009). Socioscientific issues: Theory and practice. Journal of Elementary Science Education, 21, 49-58.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30821/biolokus.v5i2.1945

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2023 Jurnal Biolokus: Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Biologi dan Biologi

indexed by :